Portland cement
From Wikipedia,
A pallet with Portland cement
Portland cement is the most common type of cement in general use around the world, as it is a basic ingredient of concrete, mortar, stucco and most non-specialty grout. It is a fine powder produced by grinding Portland cement clinker (more than 90%), a limited amount of calcium sulfate which controls the set time, and up to 5% minor constituents (as allowed by various standards).
As defined by the European Standard EN197.1, "Portland cement clinker is a hydraulic material which shall consist of at least two-thirds by mass of calcium silicates (3CaO.SiO2 and 2CaO.SiO2), the remainder consisting of aluminium- and iron-containing clinker phases and other compounds. The ratio of CaO to SiO2 shall not be less than 2.0. The magnesium content (MgO) shall not exceed 5.0% by mass." (The last two requirements were already set out in the German Standard, issued in 1909).
Portland cement clinker is made by heating, in a kiln, a homogeneous mixture of raw materials to a sintering temperature, which is about 1450 °C for modern cements. The aluminium oxide and iron oxide are present as a flux and contribute little to the strength. For special cements, such as Low Heat (LH) and Sulfate Resistant (SR) types, it is necessary to limit the amount of tricalcium aluminate (3CaO.Al2O3) formed. The major raw material for the clinker-making is usually limestone (CaCO3) mixed with a second material containing clay as source of alumino-silicate. Normally, an impure limestone which contains clay or SiO2 is used. The CaCO3 content of these limestones can be as low as 80%. Second raw materials (materials in the rawmix other than limestone) depend on the purity of the limestone. Some of the second raw materials used are: clay, shale, sand, iron ore, bauxite, fly ash and slag. When a cement kiln is fired by coal, the ash of the coal acts as a secondary raw material.
History
Portland was developed from cements (or correctly hydraulic limes) made in Britain in the early part of the nineteenth century, and its name is derived from its similarity to Portland stone, a type of building stone that was quarried on the Isle of Portland in Dorset, England.
Joseph Aspdin, a British bricklayer, in 1824 was granted a patent for a process of making a cement which he called Portland cement. His cement was an artificial hydraulic lime similar in properties to the material known as "Roman Cement" (patented in 1796 by James Parker) and his process was similar to that patented in 1822 and used since 1811 by James Frost who called his cement "British Cement". The name "Portland cement" is also recorded in a directory published in 1823 being associated with a William Lockwood and possibly others.
Aspdin's son William in 1843 made an improved version of this cement and he initially called it "Patent Portland cement" although he had no patent. In 1848 William Aspdin further improved his cement and in 1853 moved to Germany where he was involved in cement making.[1] Many people have claimed to have made the first Portland cement in the modern sense, but it is generally accepted that it was first manufactured by William Aspdin at Northfleet, England in about 1842[2]. The German Government issued a standard on Portland cement in 1878.
Production
Schematic explanation of Portland cement production
There are three fundamental stages in the production of Portland cement:
- Preparation of the raw mixture
- Production of the clinker
- Preparation of the cement
The chemistry of cement is very complex, so cement chemist notation was invented to simplify the formula of common oxides found in cement. This reflects the fact that most of the elements are present in their highest oxidation state, and chemical analyses of cement are expressed as mass percent of these notional oxides.
Rawmix preparation
-
A limestone prehomogenization pile being built by a
boom stacker 
A completed limestone prehomogenization pile
The raw materials for Portland cement production are a mixture (as fine powder in the 'Dry process' or in the form of a slurry in the 'Wet process') of minerals containing calcium oxide, silicon oxide, aluminium oxide, ferric oxide, and magnesium oxide. The raw materials are usually quarried from local rock, which in some places is already practically the desired composition and in other places requires the addition of clay and limestone, as well as iron ore, bauxite or recycled materials. The individual raw materials are first crushed, typically to below 50 mm. In many plants, some or all of the raw materials are then roughly blended in a "prehomogenization pile". The raw materials are next ground together in a rawmill. Silos of individual raw materials are arranged over the feed conveyor belt. Accurately controlled proportions of each material are delivered onto the belt by weigh-feeders. Passing into the rawmill, the mixture is ground to rawmix. The fineness of rawmix is specified in terms of the size of the largest particles, and is usually controlled so that there are less than 5-15% by mass of particles exceeding 90 μm in diameter. It is important that the rawmix contains no large particles in order to complete the chemical reactions in the kiln, and to ensure the mix is chemically homogenous. In the case of a dry process, the rawmill also dries the raw materials, usually by passing hot exhaust gases from the kiln through the mill, so that the rawmix emerges as a fine powder. This is conveyed to the blending system by conveyor belt or by a powder pump. In the case of wet process, water is added to the rawmill feed, and the mill product is a slurry with moisture content usually in the range 25-45% by mass. This slurry is conveyed to the blending system by conventional liquid pumps.
Rawmix blending
The rawmix is formulated to a very tight chemical specification. Typically, the content of individual components in the rawmix must be controlled within 0.1% or better. Calcium and silicon are present in order to form the strength-producing calcium silicates. Aluminium and iron are used in order to produce liquid ("flux") in the kiln burning zone. The liquid acts as a solvent for the silicate-forming reactions, and allows these to occur at an economically low temperature. Insufficient aluminium and iron lead to difficult burning of the clinker, while excessive amounts lead to low strength due to dilution of the silicates by aluminates and ferrites. Very small changes in calcium content lead to large changes in the ratio of alite to belite in the clinker, and to corresponding changes in the cement's strength-growth characteristics. The relative amounts of each oxide are therefore kept constant in order to maintain steady conditions in the kiln, and to maintain constant product properties. In practice, the rawmix is controlled by frequent chemical analysis (hourly by X-Ray fluorescence analysis, or every 3 minutes by prompt gamma neutron activation analysis). The analysis data is used to make automatic adjustments to raw material feed rates. Remaining chemical variation is minimized by passing the raw mix through a blending system that homogenizes up to a day's supply of rawmix (15,000 tonnes in the case of a large kiln).
Formation of clinker
-
Main article: Cement kiln
The raw mixture is heated in a cement kiln, a slowly rotating and sloped cylinder, with temperatures increasing over the length of the cylinder up to a peak temperature of 1400-1450 °C. A complex succession of chemical reactions take place (see cement kiln) as the temperature rises. The peak temperature is regulated so that the product contains sintered but not fused lumps. Sintering consists of the melting of 25-30% of the mass of the material. The resulting liquid draws the remaining solid particles together by surface tension, and acts as a solvent for the final chemical reaction in which alite is formed. Too low a temperature causes insufficient sintering and incomplete reaction, but too high a temperature results in a molten mass or glass, destruction of the kiln lining, and waste of fuel. When all goes to plan, the resulting material is clinker. On cooling, it is conveyed to storage. Some effort is usually made to blend the clinker, because although the chemistry of the rawmix may have been tightly controlled, the kiln process potentially introduces new sources of chemical variability. The clinker can be stored for a number of years before use. Prolonged exposure to water decreases the reactivity of cement produced from weathered clinker.
The enthalpy of formation of clinker from calcium carbonate and clay minerals is ~1700 kJ/kg. However, because of heat loss during production, actual values can be much higher. The high energy requirements and the release of significant amounts of carbon dioxide makes cement production a concern for global warming. See "Environmental effects" below.
Cement grinding
-
Main article: Cement mill
A 10 MW cement mill, producing cement at 270 tonnes per hour
In order to achieve the desired setting qualities in the finished product, a quantity (2-8%, but typically 5%) of calcium sulfate (usually gypsum or anhydrite) is added to the clinker and the mixture is finely ground to form the finished cement powder. This is achieved in a cement mill. The grinding process is controlled to obtain a powder with a broad particle size range, in which typically 15% by mass consists of particles below 5 μm diameter, and 5% of particles above 45 μm. The measure of fineness usually used is the "specific surface", which is the total particle surface area of a unit mass of cement. The rate of initial reaction (up to 24 hours) of the cement on addition of water is directly proportional to the specific surface. Typical values are 320-380 m2·kg-1 for general purpose cements, and 450-650 m2·kg-1 for "rapid hardening" cements. The cement is conveyed by belt or powder pump to a silo for storage. Cement plants normally have sufficient silo space for 1-20 weeks production, depending upon local demand cycles. The cement is delivered to end-users either in bags or as bulk powder blown from a pressure vehicle into the customer's silo. In developed countries, 80% or more of cement is delivered in bulk, and many cement plants have no bag-packing facility. In developing countries, bags are the normal mode of delivery.
Typical constituents of Portland clinker and Portland cement. Cement industry style notation under CCN: | Clinker | CCN | Mass% | Cement | CCN | Mass% |
| Tricalcium silicate (CaO)3.SiO2 | C3S | 45-75% | Calcium oxide, CaO | C | 61-67% |
| Dicalcium silicate (CaO)2.SiO2 | C2S | 7-32% | Silicon oxide, SiO2 | S | 19-23% |
| Tricalcium aluminate (CaO)3.Al2O3 | C3A | 0-13% | Aluminium oxide, Al2O3 | A | 2.5-6% |
| Tetracalcium aluminoferrite (CaO)4.Al2O3.Fe2O3 | C4AF | 0-18% | Ferric oxide, Fe2O3 | F | 0-6% |
| Gypsum CaSO4 · 2 H2O |
| 2-10% | Sulfate |
|
|
Decorative use of Portland cement panels on London’s Grosvenor estate
[3] The most common use for Portland cement is in the production of concrete. Concrete is a composite material consisting of aggregate (gravel and sand), cement, and water. As a construction material, concrete can be cast in almost any shape desired, and once hardened, can become a structural (load bearing) element. Users may be involved in the factory production of pre-cast units, such as panels, beams, road furniture, or may make cast-in-situ concrete such as building superstructures, roads, dams. These may be supplied with concrete mixed on site, or may be provided with "ready-mixed" concrete made at permanent mixing sites. Portland cement is also used in mortars (with sand and water only) for plasters and screeds, and in grouts (cement/water mixes squeezed into gaps to consolidate foundations, road-beds, etc).
Setting and hardening
When water is mixed with Portland cement, the product sets in a few hours and hardens over a period of weeks. These processes can vary widely depending upon the mix used and the conditions of curing of the product, but a typical concrete sets (i.e. becomes rigid) in about 6 hours, and develops a compressive strength of 8~ MPa in 24 hours. The strength rises to 15~ MPa at 3 days, 23~ MPa at one week, 35~ MPa at 4 weeks, and 41~ MPa at three months. In principle, the strength continues to rise slowly as long as water is available for continued hydration, but concrete is usually allowed to dry out after a few weeks, and this causes strength growth to stop.
Setting and hardening of Portland cement is caused by the formation of water-containing compounds, forming as a result of reactions between cement components and water. Usually, cement reacts in a plastic mixture only at water/cement ratios between 0.25 and 0.75. The reaction and the reaction products are referred to as hydration and hydrates or hydrate phases, respectively. As a result of the reactions (which start immediately), a stiffening can be observed which is very small in the beginning, but which increases with time. The point in time at which it reaches a certain level is called the start of setting. The consecutive further consolidation is called setting, after which the phase of hardening begins.
Stiffening, setting and hardening are caused by the formation of a microstructure of hydration products of varying rigidity which fills the water-filled interstitial spaces between the solid particles of the cement paste, mortar or concrete. The behaviour with time of the stiffening, setting and hardening therefore depends to a very great extent on the size of the interstitial spaces, i. e. on the water/cement ratio. The hydration products primarily affecting the strength are calcium silicate hydrates ("C-S-H phases"). Further hydration products are calcium hydroxide, sulfatic hydrates (AFm and AFt phases), and related compounds, hydrogarnet, and gehlenite hydrate. Calcium silicates or silicate constituents make up over 70 % by mass of silicate-based cements. The hydration of these compounds and the properties of the calcium silicate hydrates produced are therefore particularly important. Calcium silicate hydrates contain less CaO than the calcium silicates in cement clinker, so calcium hydroxide is formed during the hydration of Portland cement. This is available for reaction with supplementary cementitious materials such as ground granulated blast furnace slag and pozzolans. The simplified reaction of alite with water may be expressed as:
2Ca3OSiO4 + 6H2O → 3CaO.2SiO2.3H2O + 3Ca(OH)2
This is a relatively fast reaction, causing setting and strength development in the first few weeks. The reaction of belite is:
2Ca2SiO4 + 4H2O → 3CaO.2SiO2.3H2O + Ca(OH)2
This reaction is relatively slow, and is mainly responsible for strength growth after one week. Tricalcium aluminate hydration is controlled by the added calcium sulfate, which immediately goes into solution when water is added. Firstly, ettringite is rapidly formed, causing a slowing of the hydration (see tricalcium aluminate):
Ca3(AlO3)2 + 3CaSO4 + 32H2O → Ca6(AlO3)2(SO4)3.32H2O
The ettringite subsequently reacts slowly with further tricalcium aluminate to form "monosulfate" - an "AFm phase":
Ca6(AlO3)2(SO4)3.32H2O + Ca3(AlO3)2 + 4H2O → 3Ca4(AlO3)2(SO4).12H2O
This reaction is complete after 1-2 days. The calcium aluminoferrite reacts slowly due to precipitation of hydrated iron oxide:
2Ca2AlFeO5 + CaSO4 + 16H2O → Ca4(AlO3)2(SO4).12H2O + Ca(OH)2 + 2Fe(OH)3
The pH-value of the pore solution reaches comparably high values and is of importance for most of the hydration reactions.
Soon after Portland cement is mixed with water, a brief and intense hydration starts (pre-induction period). Calcium sulfates dissolve completely and alkali sulfates almost completely. Short, hexagonal needle-like ettringite crystals form at the surface of the clinker particles as a result of the reactions between calcium- and sulfate ions with tricalcium aluminate. Further, originating from tricalcium silicate, first calcium silicate hydrates (C-S-H) in colloidal shape can be observed. Caused by the formation of a thin layer of hydration products on the clinker surface, this first hydration period ceases and the induction period starts during which almost no reaction takes place. The first hydration products are too small to bridge the gap between the clinker particles and do not form a consolidated microstructure. Consequently the mobility of the cement particles in relation to one another is only slightly affected, i. e. the consistency of the cement paste turns only slightly thicker. Setting starts after approximately one to three hours, when first calcium silicate hydrates form on the surface of the clinker particles, which are very fine-grained in the beginning. After completion of the induction period, a further intense hydration of clinker phases takes place. This third period (accelerated period) starts after approximately four hours and ends after 12 to 24 hours. During this period a basic microstructure forms, consisting of C-S-H needles and C-S-H leafs, platy calcium hydroxide and ettringite crystals growing in longitudinal shape. Due to growing crystals, the gap between the cement particles is increasingly bridged. During further hydration, the hardening steadily increases, but with decreasing speed. The density of the microstructure rises and the pores fill: the filling of pores causes strength gain.
Types of Portland cement
General
There are different standards for classification of Portland cement. The two major standards are the ASTM C150 used primarily in the U.S. and European EN-197. EN 197 cement types CEM I, II, III, IV, and V do not correspond to the similarly-named cement types in ASTM C 150.
[edit] ASTM C150
There are five types of Portland cements with variations of the first three according to ASTM C150.
Type I Portland cement is known as common or general purpose cement. It is generally assumed unless another type is specified. It is commonly used for general construction especially when making precast and precast-prestressed concrete that is not to be in contact with soils or ground water. The typical compound compositions of this type are:
55% (C3S), 19% (C2S), 10% (C3A), 7% (C4AF), 2.8% MgO, 2.9% (SO3), 1.0% Ignition loss, and 1.0% free CaO.
A limitation on the composition is that the (C3A) shall not exceed fifteen percent.
Type II is intended to have moderate sulfate resistance with or without moderate heat of hydration. This type of cement costs about the same as Type I. Its typical compound composition is:
51% (C3S), 24% (C2S), 6% (C3A), 11% (C4AF), 2.9% MgO, 2.5% (SO3), 0.8% Ignition loss, and 1.0% free CaO.
A limitation on the composition is that the (C3A) shall not exceed eight percent which reduces its vulnerability to sulfates. This type is for general construction that is exposed to moderate sulfate attack and is meant for use when concrete is in contact with soils and ground water especially in the western United States due to the high sulfur content of the soil. Because of similar price to that of Type I, Type II is much used as a general purpose cement, and the majority of Portland cement sold in North America meets this specification.
Note: Cement meeting (among others) the specifications for Type I and II has become commonly available on the world market.
Type III is has relatively high early strength. Its typical compound composition is:
57% (C3S), 19% (C2S), 10% (C3A), 7% (C4AF), 3.0% MgO, 3.1% (SO3), 0.9% Ignition loss, and 1.3% free CaO.
This cement is similar to Type I, but ground finer. Some manufacturers make a separate clinker with higher C3S and/or C3A content, but this is increasingly rare, and the general purpose clinker is usually used, ground to a specific surface typically 50-80% higher. The gypsum level may also be increased a small amount. This gives the concrete using this type of cement a three day compressive strength equal to the seven day compressive strength of types I and II. Its seven day compressive strength is almost equal to types I and II 28 day compressive strengths. The only downside is that the six month strength of type III is the same or slightly less than that of types I and II. Therefore the long-term strength is sacrificed a little. It is usually used for precast concrete manufacture, where high 1-day strength allows fast turnover of molds. It may also be used in emergency construction and repairs and construction of machine bases and gate installations.
Type IV Portland cement is generally known for its low heat of hydration. Its typical compound composition is:
28% (C3S), 49% (C2S), 4% (C3A), 12% (C4AF), 1.8% MgO, 1.9% (SO3), 0.9% Ignition loss, and 0.8% free CaO.
The percentages of (C2S) and (C4AF) are relatively high and (C3S) and (C3A) are relatively low. A limitation on this type is that the maximum percentage of (C3A) is seven, and the maximum percentage of (C3S) is thirty-five. This causes the heat given off by the hydration reaction to develop at a slower rate. However, as a consequence the strength of the concrete develops slowly. After one or two years the strength is higher than the other types after full curing. This cement is used for very large concrete structures, such as dams, which have a low surface to volume ratio. This type of cement is generally not stocked by manufacturers but some might consider a large special order. This type of cement has not been made for many years, because Portland-pozzolan cements and ground granulated blast furnace slag addition offer a cheaper and more reliable alternative.
Type V is used where sulfate resistance is important. Its typical compound composition is:
38% (C3S), 43% (C2S), 4% (C3A), 9% (C4AF), 1.9% MgO, 1.8% (SO3), 0.9% Ignition loss, and 0.8% free CaO.
This cement has a very low (C3A) composition which accounts for its high sulfate resistance. The maximum content of (C3A) allowed is five percent for Type V Portland cement. Another limitation is that the (C4AF) + 2(C3A) composition cannot exceed twenty percent. This type is used in concrete that is to be exposed to alkali soil and ground water sulfates which react with (C3A) causing disruptive expansion. It is unavailable in many places although its use is common in the western United States and Canada. As with Type IV, Type V Portland cement has mainly been supplanted by the use of ordinary cement with added ground granulated blast furnace slag or tertiary blended cements containing slag and fly ash.
Types Ia, IIa, and IIIa have the same composition as types I, II, and III. The only difference is that in Ia, IIa, and IIIa an air-entraining agent is ground into the mix. The air-entrainment must meet the minimum and maximum optional specification found in the ASTM manual. These types are only available in the eastern United States and Canada but can only be found on a limited basis. They are a poor approach to air-entrainment which improves resistance to freezing under low temperatures.
EN 197
EN 197-1 defines 5 classes of common cement that comprise Portland cement as a main constituent. These classes differ from the ASTM classes.
| I | Portland cement | Comprising Portland cement and up to 5% of minor additional constituents |
| II | Portland-composite cement | Portland cement and up to 35% of other single constituents |
| III | Blastfurnace cement | Portland cement and higher percentages of blastfurnace slag |
| IV | Pozzolanic cement | Portland cement and up to 55% of pozzolanic constituents |
| V | Composite cement | Portland cement, blastfurnace slag and pozzolana or fly ash |
Constituents that are permitted in Portland-composite cements are blastfurnace slag, silica fume, natural and industrial pozzolans, silicious and calcareous fly ash, burnt shale and limestone.
[edit] White Portland cement
-
White Portland cement differs physically from the gray form only in its color, and as such can fall into many of the above categories (e.g. ASTM Type I, II and/or III). However, its manufacture is significantly different from that of the gray product, and is treated separately.
[edit] Safety and environmental effects
Sampling fast set concrete made from Portland cement
Safety
When cement is mixed with water a highly alkaline solution (pH ~13) is produced by the dissolution of calcium, sodium and potassium hydroxides. Gloves, goggles and a filter mask should be used for protection. Hands should be washed after contact. Cement can cause serious burns if contact is prolonged or if skin is not washed promptly. Once the cement hydrates, the hardened mass can be safely touched without gloves.
In Scandinavia, France and the UK, the level of chromium(VI), which is thought to be toxic and a major skin irritant, may not exceed 2 ppm (parts per million).
Environmental effects
Portland cement manufacture can cause environmental impacts at all stages of the process. These include emissions of airborne pollution in the form of dust, gases, noise and vibration when operating machinery and during blasting in quarries, consumption of large quantities of fuel during manufacture, release of CO2 from the raw materials during manufacture, and damage to countryside from quarrying. Equipment to reduce dust emissions during quarrying and manufacture of cement is widely used, and equipment to trap and separate exhaust gases are coming into increased use. Environmental protection also includes the re-integration of quarries into the countryside after they have been closed down by returning them to nature or re-cultivating them.
Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Sulfur Dioxide Exposure in Portland Cement Plants, from the Centers for Disease Control states "Workers at Portland cement facilities, particularly those burning fuel containing sulfur, should be aware of the acute and chronic effects of exposure to SO2 [sulfur dioxide], and peak and full-shift concentrations of SO2 should be periodically measured." [4] "The Arizona Department of Environmental Quality was informed this week that the Arizona Portland Cement Co. failed a second round of testing for emissions of hazardous air pollutants at the company's Rillito plant near Tucson. The latest round of testing, performed in January 2003 by the company, is designed to ensure that the facility complies with federal standards governing the emissions of dioxins and furans, which are byproducts of the manufacturing process." [5] Cement Reviews' "Environmental News" web page details case after case of environmental problems with cement manufacturing. [6]
An independent research effort of AEA Technology to identify critical issues for the cement industry today concluded the most important environment, health and safety performance issues facing the cement industry are atmospheric releases (including greenhouse gas emissions, dioxin, NOx, SO2, and particulates), accidents and worker exposure to dust. [7]
The CO2 associated with Portland cement manufacture falls into 3 categories:
(1) CO2 derived from decarbonation of limestone,
(2) CO2 from kiln fuel combustion,
(3) CO2 produced by vehicles in cement plants and distribution.
Source 1 is fairly constant: minimum around 0.47 kg CO2 per kg of cement, maximum 0.54, typical value around 0.50 world-wide. Source 2 varies with plant efficiency: efficient precalciner plant 0.24 kg CO2 per kg cement, low-efficiency wet process as high as 0.65, typical modern practices (e.g UK) averaging around 0.30. Source 3 is almost insignificant at 0.002-0.005. So typical total CO2 is around 0.80 kg CO2 per kg finished cement. This leaves aside the CO2 associated with electric power consumption, since this varies according to the local generation type and efficiency. Typical electrical energy consumption is of the order of 90-150 kWh per tonne cement, equivalent to 0.09-0.15 kg CO2 per kg finished cement if the electricity is coal-generated.
Overall, with nuclear- or hydroelectric power and efficient manufacturing, CO2 generation can be as little as 0.7 kg per kg cement, but can be as high as twice this amount. The thrust of innovation for the future is to reduce sources 1 and 2 by modification of the chemistry of cement, by the use of wastes, and by adopting more efficient processes. Although cement manufacturing is clearly a very large CO2 emitter, concrete (of which cement makes up about 15%) compares quite favorably with other building systems in this regard[citation needed]. See also cement kiln emissions.
[edit] Cement plants as alternatives to conventional waste disposal or processing
Due to the high temperatures inside cement kilns, combined with the oxidizing (oxygen-rich) atmosphere and long residence times, cement kilns have been used as a processing option for various types of waste streams. The waste streams often contain combustible material which allows the substitution of part of the fossil fuel normally used in the process.
Waste materials used in cement kilns as a fuel supplement:[8]
- Car and truck tires - steel belts are easily tolerated in the kilns
- Waste solvents and lubricants
- Hazardous waste - cement kilns completely destroy hazardous organic compounds
- Meat and bone meal - slaughterhouse waste due to bovine spongiform encephalopathy contamination concerns
- Waste plastics
- Sewage sludge
- Rice hulls
- Sugarcane waste
- Used wooden railroad ties (railway sleepers)
Portland cement manufacture also has the potential to remove industrial byproducts from the waste-stream, effectively sequestering some environmentally damaging wastes.[9] These include:
- Slag
- Fly ash (from power plants)
- Silica fume (from steel mills)
- Synthetic gypsum (from desulfurisation)
[edit] See also
References
- ^ "The Cement Industry 1796-1914: A History," by A. J. Francis, 1977
- ^ P. C. Hewlett (Ed)Lea's Chemistry of Cement and Concrete: 4th Ed, Arnold, 1998, ISBN 0-340-56589-6, Chapter 1
- ^ Housing Prototypes: Page Street
- ^ Epidemiologic Notes and Reports Sulfur Dioxide Exposure in Portland Cement Plants
- ^ http://www.azdeq.gov/function/news/2003/jan.html
- ^ CemNet.com | The latest cement news and information
- ^ Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry: Environment, Health & Safety Performance Improvement
- ^ Chris Boyd (December 2001). "Recovery of Wastes in Cement Kilns". World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Retrieved on 2008-09-25.
- ^ (1988) Design and Control of Concrete Mixtures. Skokie, Illinois: Portland Cement Association, p. 15. ISBN 0-89312-087-1. "As a generalization, probably 50% of all industrial byproducts have potential as raw materials for the manufacture of Portland cement."
External links
How do you grow entrepreneurship at NC State?
The Lenovo design and engineering team has been working on this one for well over a year. It started out as a idea: let’s build the most advanced ThinkPad ever, in the thinnest and lightest package possible. What a great opportunity to exercise the world class technical capabilities of the Lenovo team. The best engineers and designers thrive on challenges like this. Who wouldn’t?
February 15th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
For those who like the picture in the post, head to our Flickr account and you can find it there in high resolution glory.
February 15th, 2008 at 12:47 pm
The X300 is truly a great feat of engineering and carries forward the tradition of the Thinkpad series. A 3-lb Thinkpad with the best keyboard ever, multitude of ports and connectivity options, integrated DVD burner - ah, life couldn’t possibly get better! Now, if only it was available with a regular HDD option instead of SSD only
I can’t help but compare this to the MacBook Air, though! As a working professional that spends my time on the road instead of at the neighborhood Starbucks, the X300 is what you want by your side!
David, kudos to you and your team in NC and Japan for this wonderful new laptop! Go Team Lenovo!
February 15th, 2008 at 12:53 pm
Bravo With X300. Great Job.
Now to bring the LED back light to the rest of the Thinkpad line.
February 15th, 2008 at 1:11 pm
You finally officially confirm this thing.
Well it appears as if you put a lot of effort into this one, but the question is…what are you replacing with this, the T line or the X line?
(An 11 inch 1024×768 version would have been ace, but I’m not complaining.)
February 15th, 2008 at 1:31 pm
Wow! This looks really promising, Please use HIGH QUALITY screens with (high) resolution and don’t mess up on the actual production…
I will start to save on money for this “one’.
February 15th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
What will be the fastest CPU that the X300 can support?
February 15th, 2008 at 2:49 pm
The new Kodachi aka ThinkPad X300 looks very promising. - I’am glad to see, that David Hill and the whole Lenovo team have put in their efforts and hard work to develop a completely new and possibly more sophisticated ThinkPad model.
I followed the tracks of the Kodachi now for some time…
–> http://www.notebook-foren.de/b.....php?t=9958
…and can’t wait to see it in reality, in order to give it a serious working tryout.
It will also be interesting to see how the market adapts to it and of course, as Mark Hopkins already said at another place in the Lenovo forum, how the long term impressions with this new X300 will be.
February 15th, 2008 at 3:13 pm
If it had ThinkLight i would’ve bought it to replace my beloved T61 i guess ill wait for the T62 anyhow Thinkpad X300 is a great notebook i hope it will maintain Thinkpads legendary quality.
February 15th, 2008 at 5:11 pm
You put the stripes back!
Two words: Thank you!
-Jan
February 15th, 2008 at 6:31 pm
It’s nice to see a very thin, light laptop that was actually aimed at the business market about to hit the streets. Thanks for not wasting our time by providing both form and function, unlike the MacBook Air. I believe that the people who buy the X300 will be the people who avoided buying the Air, so I don’t think it matters that the Air came out first.
- Chris
February 15th, 2008 at 6:52 pm
The X300 has the brightest ThinkLight ever made. It works great.
February 15th, 2008 at 7:02 pm
I want one.
February 15th, 2008 at 7:09 pm
David,
Can you comment about the 3 cell battery? It seems like the X300 wouldn’t have a very good battery life compared to the current X61 with 8 cell. Was the battery life sacrificed in order to keep the X300 thin?
February 15th, 2008 at 7:21 pm
Any ideas on availability of Tablet variants?
Also, is this a X61 replacement or a different product range? Great work btw, this is what the Sony SZ should’ve been over a year ago, but it you guys to finish up on making the best of this form factor. I’m worried about the 1440×900 LCD being perhaps too dense, but hopefully the bright LED display will make up for that. Great work!
February 15th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
X300 looks actually good. But, where is a firewire port, for instance, or an expresscard slot? 3 usb’s quite enough, possibly, for such a slim device; but some your competitors, gents, succeeds in putting more technology in less space much more, imho (sony tz or panasonic w7, for instance)…
February 15th, 2008 at 7:59 pm
Of course the stripes are back, I promised this months ago. They look great.
February 15th, 2008 at 8:43 pm
I’m wondering what alternative options we have to replace the optical drive module? (If it is modular at all.)
February 15th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
Very nice. I, for one, welcome the addition of the solid state drive (even with its hefty price). Now there’s only two questions I have: what’s the fastest processor I can get with it? and when will a bigger SSD be available?
That said, this actually makes me want to buy a new laptop instead of just thinking about it…
February 15th, 2008 at 10:34 pm
While I know that perfection is individual and that there is always something, I drooled when I first saw the Macbook Air, and now there’s a Thinkpad with most of the compromises fixed, starting with the screen. I was considering an X in the summer and gave up in favour of T61p in the end because of the resolution. Well, this one - or its successor - is most likely my next notebook.
Now, if only one could order it without those #%”! Windows and Microsoft keys which make any real keyboard work painful… (I won’t even mention cover over touchpad. Not that that would bother me so much, if only the thing stayed dead after standby or hibernation.)
February 15th, 2008 at 10:58 pm
[...] at least the Lenovo folks have some design sense: the picture at the top of this blog post is worthy of Apple. The hi-res version is on their flickr [...]
February 15th, 2008 at 11:06 pm
It is good to see Lenovo with such a good piece of design.
Funny is that I was chatting later last night with a friend that owns a T61p (we are both new Lenovo users - I converted from an Macbook) and we both agreed that we would buy Lenovo again - even though in the beginning we used to think that the black “lunch box” design was a little strange
.
Personally now I think the black magnesium case “sexy” and would like it even better on a lighter and slimmer package.
Keep the good working going and hope to see the X300 in the shops soon!
February 16th, 2008 at 5:21 am
i need HDMI port
February 16th, 2008 at 6:52 am
I love the design of this Laptop, from what I see in photos, a lot of traditional ThinkPad design details are back (red stripes, less silver parts, etc).
It seems we will not see Z60/Titanium mistakes again, thank God!
Keep up the great work
February 16th, 2008 at 10:45 am